The National Institutes of health has published a
statement saying that a two-year-old child, born to a mother with the AIDS
causing HIV virus and testing positive for the virus itself, is now off
medication. How did this happen? What implication does this have for future
treatment of HIV infected newborns? First
off, lets be clear, being off medication is not the same thing as being
cured. The child, whose sex has not been
released, has undetectable levels of virus using standard tests. However, more sophisticated test still show
that the virus remains. The amount of
virus is very low, and it is not replicating at this point.
The theory is that this “functional” cure occurred because
the child could be treated so quickly.
He or she received the first doses of antiretroviral medication (the HIV
virus is a retrovirus) approximately 30 hours after it was born. Thus preventing the virus from firmly
establishing itself in its host’s cells.
The bottom line, in my opinion, is that this is a
functional, not an absolute, cure. It is
certainly not impossible that in the future this child may need to be put back
on antiretroviral therapy. However, in
the meantime at least, he or she does not have to be medicated and can go on
living a normal life.
No comments:
Post a Comment